why does it always stop

why does it always stop with music? isn’t Riker’s Island infinitely more powerful as a symphony? Could Mahler have even come close to expressing the death, the anger, hatred, the languor, the longing, the rocks, the sea? no. men and women created this magnificent masterpiece of damnation.

rikers

why does is always end at Revelation 22:20? didn’t Martin Luther King contribute a chapter to the Bible (“the Books”)? Isn’t the Civil War (my Civil War and your Civil War) a part of the Old Testament? The Bible was written by men and women, simply by their living in conjunction with a Greater Consciousness.

why does it always end at the edge of the canvas? doesn’t blood on the floor count? didn’t you spill something out of your heart just now, there, next to the still life of your child’s grave? isn’t that a tear stain on the sky? just what do you call “paint”?

Justice John Paul Stevens is a smart guy

“What really for me marks a conservative judge is one who doesn’t decide more than he has to in order to do his own job,” he said, relaxed in shirt sleeves and his signature bow tie in chambers floodlit by April sunshine. “Our job is to decide cases and resolve controversies. It’s not to write broad rules that may answer society’s questions at large.”

This is contradictory to his portrayal as a liberal savior by the Democrats.  Very few people understand the terms conservative, though, and liberal has lost any meaning it might have had at one point.

Conservative means parsimonious, not “right-wing”, or “old-fashioned”,or Republican (of all things!).

As the last surviving Justice who served in WWII, he also said:

“It really was a unique period of time, in the sense that the total country, with very few exceptions, was really united,” Justice Stevens said. “We were all on the same team, wanting the same result. You don’t like to think of war as having anything good about it, but it is something that was a positive experience.”

I’ve often thought that.  4 times in history that the United States was “united” were the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, WWII, and September 11. This unity isn’t simple or trivial, and it doesn’t mean we’re all just a bunch of happy friends. And I don’t think that the people were united for the technically correct reason.  But, even Noam Chomsky was sad on September 11th, and didn’t waste a word on decrying the failed state of the Union.

crucificarlo!

“crucificarlo!”  good phrase to know in many languages.

“crucifie-le!”

“распять!”

it used to be “I love you.”

“Ich liebe dich.”

“J’ t’aime.”

now, there are so many more opportunities to assemble as a mob, and condemn someone to death.  just makes sense.  think of how many times in a day you, or someone you know, throws out that dagger of total condemnation, without any desire to try to investigate the situation or the person.

heck, it’s pretty much question #9 on the  drivers’ ed exam!  “what do you do if a guy cuts you off, and he’s from Boston?”

“Kreuzige ihn!”

and then republicans and democrats are crucifying everything! everyone!

“Hey, man!  Crucify You!”

“You too, buddy!”

“Hey, pal! I got your cross right here!”

Germans continues to speak German; French Canadians are not French, they speak French

English is most creatively applied by hip hoppers, and it should be handed over to them. The language will grow. Hip hop will nurture the English language like Shakespeare did.
Shakespeare was probably not a real person. C’mon. Just listen to the name: shake spear. Its for sure a hip hop collective that fronted as some kind of imaginary playwright.
Of course I expect you to make the appropriate conscious transitions to let this notion happen in your brain. We all have a responsibility to use our brains a lot.
Pretty soon, we will lose all contact with California. Everybody in Cali will “misplace” their cell phones and their car keys because they will be fogged in. All calls to California will be forwarded to an automated answering service. As Bob Dylan once said to me, in a song, “when you hear the beep, it will be 3 o’clock.”
Spanish is the real Esperanto. Start now, and you will be able to communicate in the 21st century.

Jesus’ Burial Cloth- Why Folded? – Reading the Bible – why are people so slpppy?

I got an email today, which referenced this article by Ma CiCi – a true Biblical scholar, no doubt.  She’ wondering why Jesus folded the burial “napkin” that was “on his face” in the tomb. Jesus’ Burial Cloth- Why Folded?.

Did you ever wonder and think: Just ‘why’ did Jesus fold up this cloth and lay it, separated from the other linen after His resurrection?

She decides to link this idea to a “Hebrew tradition” of table manners: when you’re don eating – really done – you’re supposed to wad your napkin up and throw it on your plate.  If you’re just going ptty or something, you instead fold your napkin to indicate to the waiters that you are coming back (not to clear your place).

In order to understand the significance of the folded cloth, you have to understand a little bit about Hebrew tradition. The folded napkin had to do with a clear message between a Master and his Servant. Every Jewish person knows this tradition. When the servant set the dinner table for his master, he made sure that it was exactly the way the master wanted it. After the table was perfectly furnished perfectly then the servant would wait, just out of sight, until the master had finished eating. The servant would not dare touch that table, until the master was finished.

So, first of all, I’ve never thought of this as a Hebrew tradition between Master and Servant – I learned it when I started going to restaurants other than IHOP, as just common restaurant etiquette.  I’ve noticed many times that this etiquette has mostly disparaged in Amerika.  But, here’s a short description of how to use your napkin at a restaurant (from http://whatscookingamerica.net/Menu/DiningEtiquetteGuide.htm):

As soon as you are seated, remove the napkin from your place setting, unfold it, and put it in your lap. Do not shake it open. At some very formal restaurants, the waiter may do this for the diners, but it is not inappropriate to place your own napkin in your lap, even when this is the case.

The napkin rests on the lap till the end of the meal. Don’t clean the cutlery or wipe your face with the napkin. NEVER use it to wipe your nose!

If you excuse yourself from the table, loosely fold the napkin and place it to the left or right of your plate. Do not refold your napkin or wad it up on the table either. Never place your napkin on your chair.

At the end of the meal, leave the napkin semi-folded at the left side of the place setting. It should not be crumpled or twisted; nor should it be folded. The napkin must also not be left on the chair.

I mean, the burial cloth is NOT a friggin napkin!  It’s interesting how many translations do refer to it as a “napkin” – even more interesting, the number of different terms used (see bottom of this post). But, for certain, it’s not a restaurant: it’s a tomb!   So, the whole argument she’s making – The folded cloth give this clear message, saying, “I’m not finished yet. I’m coming back!” – is just not valid – that is to say, her conclusion is not made in a valid way.

I’m not saying that the message is wrong.  I don’t even really care that Miss CiCi has limited academic skill, but feels the need to spread theological musings among people who also lack the academic skills to assess her conclusions for themselves.  I actually want to know what the truth is!

It bothers me, too, that  Miss CiCi says “on his face, ” when the NIV translation she quotes says:

the burial cloth that had been around Jesus’ head.

This also varies in translations (see below).  The point is: how can you say one thing in one sentence, and then some something different in,like, the next sentence.

The actual Hebrew tradition involves the Tachrichim (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachrichim). Here are some salient observations:

The traditional clothing for burying the dead are tahrihim, simple white shrouds.

Regardless of gender, they include shirt, pants, a head covering, and a belt.

If the body has been prepared for burial with ritual cleansing (taharah), the body will automatically be dressed in tahrihim.

Tahrihim swaddle the entire body, including the face, so that the deceased is both clothed and protected against the gaze of other people. If shrouds are used, the body is placed in the coffin, which is then closed. In Israel, it is customary to bury the deceased (except soldiers) without a coffin – The body is carried to the grave wrapped in a tallit..

Finally, why does she think that Jesus folded the burial garments? In John 20:12, Mary meets the two angels that had attended to Jesus.

and saw two angels in white, seated where Jesus’ body had been, one at the head and the other at the foot.

I’m thinking they folded the stuff.  I mean, you think the angels said to Jesus, “Hey, we’re not folding your crap!  What,you’re leaving your tomb a mess? Fold that Tahrihim up before you rise from the dead!”

But, in the end, all this bitchin’, and I don’t have an alternative answer!  Except to say that Hebrew tradition is so much stronger than any WASP/Amerikan trandtions that it is difficult for non Jews to “feel” the inherent power in traditional acts, when they are presented.  In other words, the writers of the scriptures simply would not think of leaving the Tahrihim unfolded.  Just like some people do get offended if you don’t immediately unfold your napkin at a restaurant and put it in your lap.

—————————-  How is “napkin” tranlsated in John 20:7? ———————

New International Version (©1984)
as well as the burial cloth that had been around Jesus’ head. The cloth was folded up by itself, separate from the linen.

New Living Translation (©2007)
while the cloth that had covered Jesus’ head was folded up and lying apart from the other wrappings.

English Standard Version (©2001)
and the face cloth, which had been on Jesus’ head, not lying with the linen cloths but folded up in a place by itself.

New American Standard Bible (©1995)
and the face-cloth which had been on His head, not lying with the linen wrappings, but rolled up in a place by itself.

International Standard Version (©2008)
and that the handkerchief that had been on Jesus’ head was not lying with the linen cloths but was rolled up in a separate place.

GOD’S WORD® Translation (©1995)
He also saw the cloth that had been on Jesus’ head. It wasn’t lying with the strips of linen but was rolled up separately.

King James Bible
And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself.

American King James Version
And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself.

American Standard Version
and the napkin, that was upon his head, not lying with the linen cloths, but rolled up in a place by itself.

Bible in Basic English
And the cloth, which had been round his head, not with the linen bands but rolled up in a place by itself.

Douay-Rheims Bible
And the napkin that had been about his head, not lying with the linen cloths, but apart, wrapped up into one place.

Darby Bible Translation
and the handkerchief which was upon his head, not lying with the linen cloths, but folded up in a distinct place by itself.

English Revised Version
and the napkin, that was upon his head, not lying with the linen cloths, but rolled up in a place by itself.

Webster’s Bible Translation
And the napkin that was about his head, not lying with the linen cloths, but wrapped together in a place by itself.

Weymouth New Testament
and the towel, which had been placed over the face of Jesus, not lying with the cloths, but folded up and put by itself.

World English Bible
and the cloth that had been on his head, not lying with the linen cloths, but rolled up in a place by itself.

Young’s Literal Translation
and the napkin that was upon his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but apart, having been folded up, in one place;

just a wild thought – what about Des Moines Noir?

http://travel.webshots.com/photo/1220384697061650839PZNYDn

fiction could be no truer than the sordid crime being perpetrating outside one of the cold-calling debt collection agencies in downtown Des Moines Iowa. I mean the smoking area for employees of course, outside the front door of Debt Collection Solutions or whatever on Grand or something.. it’s so real it doesn’t have to really have any elements of reality!

downtown Des Moines?  never been there? that’s because no one has ever been there – really.  if you ever saw the Twighlight Zone where the girl is waiting for the bus at the bus depot – forever! -for the bus that will never come! then you have some picture of Court Street, in the wee hours of the morn.

Noir!? I’d call it “Nuage”… Des Moines Nuage

Peyton Manning doesn’t make mistakes

Here are some highlights from the Wikipedia article for Peyton Williams Manning:

  • He is widely regarded as one of the best quarterbacks of all time, and has the record for most NFL MVP awards with four.[1]
  • Manning holds NFL records for consecutive seasons with over 4,000 yards passing and the most total seasons with 4,000 or more yards passing in a career.[3][4]
  • Manning holds the third-highest career passer rating (95.2) among active quarterbacks
  • He is the all-time Colts franchise leader in career wins, career passing yards, pass attempts, pass completions, and passing touchdowns.[5]
  • Since the Colts drafted Manning in 1998, the team has the highest conversion rate on 3rd down (44.6%) and 4th down (61.1%) plays in the NFL. While leading the Colts to their Super Bowl XLI victory in 2007, Manning helped the team to an NFL record by converting 56.1% of its 3rd downs.[7]

Now tell me this: how does that guy throw an interception in the 4th quarter of the Superbowl?  I mean, any OTHER mistake maybe.  But for Peyton Manning? Not an interception.

Oh, Americans kill you if you haunt their football! I mean, how much money do you think was riding on the Vegas call of Indiana by 5?  Of course, you know the way to make money in gambling is to be AGAINST the odds, e.g. that the Saints would win by some crazy circumstance – like an interception in the 4th quarter, trhown by one of the greatest passing QBs in history.  How much?  You think ‘b-b-b-billions?” Or just millions?